Guide

Pull tester bridge leg spacing and the reduction factor

In short

Close supports can flatter results. For tests to failure and preliminary tests, keep adist at 3 × hef or more, or apply αdist while adist exceeds 1.5 × hef. In concrete, preliminary tests need L over 1.0 × hef, failure tests with L under 1.5 × hef are noted and repeated, and proof tests allow L of 0.5 × hef.

This guide explains how site tests are planned and carried out under BS 8539:2012+A1:2021. It does not replace the standard, the anchor manufacturer's data, or the instructions of the specifier or engineer responsible for the job, who decides the test plan, the loads and the factors. A test records what happened on the day; it does not approve a fixing for use.

Key figures

Spacing that needs no reductiona_dist of 3 × h_ef or more (L of 1.5 × h_ef or more)
Reduction factor α_dist0.4 + a_dist ÷ (5 × h_ef)
Where α_dist can be useda_dist more than 1.5 × h_ef, and h_ef up to 150 mm
Preliminary tests in concrete, loading to the test loadL more than 1.0 × h_ef
Proof tests in concreteL at least 0.5 × h_ef, which suits most proof tests
Staht t25 and t60 standard bridgesα_dist = 1.0 up to h_ef = 42 mm. With α_dist: up to 84 mm in masonry, and up to 63 mm for preliminary tests in concrete (L more than 1.0 × h_ef)
Staht Bridge 375-25 and 375-60α_dist = 1.0 up to h_ef = 125 mm
Staht Bridge 575-25α_dist = 1.0 for any h_ef up to 150 mm; in concrete, L at least 1.5 × h_ef up to 191 mm

Why does the bridge support spacing matter?

The support spacing matters because supports close to an anchor can press on the base material that would otherwise break away, so the anchor seems to hold more than it would in service. In concrete, an anchor that fails by pulling out a cone of concrete gets help from any support standing inside that cone.

In concrete, the effect only shows when the anchor is loaded near its failure load and a concrete cone is the likely failure, so the rules are strict for tests to failure and preliminary tests, and relaxed for proof tests. In masonry, the spacing rules apply to every test except proof tests.

What do L, a_dist and h_ef mean?

hef is the effective embedment depth, L the distance from the anchor to the nearest support, and adist the support spacing.

  • h_ef, the effective embedment depth, is the depth from the surface to the lowest point at which the anchor grips the base material. It is not the hole depth.
  • L, the reaction spacing, is the distance from the anchor's centre line to the closest bridge support.
  • a_dist, the support spacing, is measured to the axis of point supports, or as the clear width between continuous supports. For a bridge set symmetrically over the anchor, a_dist = 2 × L. Staht's figures, 127 mm for the t25 and t60 standard bridges and 375 mm and 575 mm for the wider bridges, are the clear distance between the feet along the bridge (Staht datasheets), the basis the industry's published bridge table uses. That errs on the safe side: the feet of a four-leg bridge actually sit further from the anchor, so the clear spacing gives a slightly higher test load, never a lower one.

How close can the supports be?

TestBase materialClosest support, LIf the supports are closer
Test to failureConcreteIdeally 1.5 × h_ef or moreApply α_dist if a_dist is more than 1.5 × h_ef, note the spacing in the report, and repeat with wider spacing unless the cone resistance is checked another way
Preliminary test, to the test loadConcreteMore than 1.0 × h_ef, ideally 1.5 × h_efApply α_dist; the spacing may need widening if the anchors are later loaded to failure
Proof test, up to 1.5 × N_recConcreteAt least 0.5 × h_ef, which suits most proof testsα_dist is not used in proof tests
Any test except proof testsBrickFeet on the neighbouring bricks, not on the brick holding the anchorApply α_dist if a_dist is under 3 × h_ef (and more than 1.5 × h_ef)
Any test except proof testsBlock1.5 × h_ef or moreApply α_dist if a_dist is more than 1.5 × h_ef; otherwise use a wider bridge
Proof testMasonryFeet on the neighbouring units where possible; with large units, 0.5 × h_efα_dist is not used in proof tests

How is the reduction factor α_dist worked out?

Up to h_ef = 150 mm. If adist is at least 3 × hef, αdist = 1.0. If adist is less than 3 × hef but more than 1.5 × hef, αdist = 0.4 + adist ÷ (5 × hef) (equation B.12 of BS 8539). BS 8539 also caps the spacing needed at 450 mm, but up to hef = 150 mm, 3 × hef never exceeds 450 mm, so the cap does not change the answer. If adist is 1.5 × h_ef or less, the bridge is too narrow for this method: use a wider one.

Deeper than 150 mm. Equation B.12 does not apply. In concrete, keep the closest support at least 1.5 × hef from the anchor, which means adist of at least 3 × hef. In masonry, the rules for bricks and blocks apply. EOTA TR 053 needs no reduction in multi-leaf walls of small solid bricks, such as solid clay bricks, provided the supports are more than 1.5 × hef apart and leave room for the failure to form.

αdist divides the test load, so a value below 1.0 raises it. In tests to failure, αdist multiplies the result, so it lowers the allowable resistance. Either way, close supports cannot make an anchor look stronger than it is. See preliminary tests.

EOTA TR 053, Section 3.2.1, drops the reduction where the failure stays local: anchors deeper than 150 mm in multi-leaf walls of small solid bricks, such as solid clay bricks, anchors in mortar joints, and anchors in hollow or perforated bricks. The supports must still be more than 1.5 × h_ef apart and leave room for the failure to form.

Staht bridges: support spacing and depth

BridgeSupport spacing a_dist (clear, between the feet along the bridge)LDepth with α_dist = 1.0Maximum loadHeight to the underside of the bridge
t25 standard bridge127 mm63.5 mmUp to 42 mm; with α_dist, up to 84 mm in masonry or 63 mm for preliminary tests in concrete25 kN146 mm
t60 standard bridge127 mm63.5 mmUp to 42 mm; with α_dist, up to 84 mm in masonry or 63 mm for preliminary tests in concrete60 kN146 mm
Bridge 375-25375 mm187.5 mmUp to 125 mm25 kN322 mm, plus up to 20 mm of foot adjustment
Bridge 375-60375 mm187.5 mmUp to 125 mm60 kN318 mm, plus up to 20 mm of foot adjustment
Bridge 575-25575 mm287.5 mmAny h_ef up to 150 mm; in concrete, L at least 1.5 × h_ef up to 191 mm25 kN544 mm, plus 20 mm of foot adjustment

Which Staht bridge suits which anchor?

The right Staht bridge is the narrowest one whose support spacing reaches 3 × hef for a test to failure or a preliminary test. A narrower bridge can still be used with αdist while its spacing is more than 1.5 × hef, with two extra conditions in concrete: a preliminary test also needs the closest support more than 1.0 × hef from the anchor, and a test to failure with the closest support under 1.5 × hef must be noted in the report and repeated with a wider bridge, unless the cone resistance is checked another way. Proof tests can use a bridge with deeper anchors than the table shows. In masonry, the brick and block rules above apply; the reduction is dropped only in the EOTA TR 053 cases described under αdist.

For the 575 bridge, equation B.12 stops at hef = 150 mm. Deeper than that, in concrete, keep L at 1.5 × hef or more: the 575 bridge does this up to h_ef = 191 mm.

Worked example: h_ef = 80 mm, a preliminary test in concrete blockwork.

  • t60 standard bridge: 127 mm is less than 3 × 80 = 240 mm, and more than 1.5 × 80 = 120 mm, so α_dist applies: 0.4 + 127 ÷ (5 × 80) = 0.4 + 0.318 = 0.718. The test load rises by a factor of 1 ÷ 0.718 = 1.39.
  • Bridge 375-60: 375 mm is more than 240 mm, so α_dist = 1.0 and the test load is not raised.

In concrete, the standard bridge would not do at this depth: L must be more than 1.0 × h_ef (80 mm) while testing to the test load, and the standard bridge's L is 63.5 mm.

Worked example: h_ef = 150 mm. 3 × hef = 450 mm. The Bridge 375-25 (375 mm, more than 1.5 × 150 = 225 mm) gives αdist = 0.4 + 375 ÷ 750 = 0.900. That suits masonry, or a preliminary test in concrete, where L = 187.5 mm is more than 150 mm. For a test to failure in concrete, L is under 1.5 × 150 = 225 mm, so use the 575-25. The Bridge 575-25 is wider than 450 mm, so α_dist = 1.0.

Never load a bridge above its maximum load: the 375-25 and 575-25 take a t60 load cell but are limited to 25 kN.

How should the bridge sit on masonry?

On masonry, put the feet where the test will load the wall around the anchor as well as the anchor itself. How depends on what you are fixing into:

  • Solid brick: stand the feet on the bricks around the anchor's brick, never on it. Then a weak joint, or a brick shaken loose when the hole was drilled, shows up in the result. Standing the bridge upright usually achieves this (NASC TG4:25 §11.1).
  • Blocks: keep the closest support at least 1.5 × hef from the anchor, or apply αdist as set out in the table above.
  • Perforated or hollow bricks: turn the feet at an angle so that neither lands along a row of holes.
  • Proof tests: use the neighbouring units where you can; on large units the closest support may come in to 0.5 × h_ef.

See testing in masonry.

What else should a test bridge do?

Before relying on a bridge for a particular test, run three checks:

  1. Security: on a wall or soffit, it is fixed so that nothing falls if the anchor lets go.
  2. Aim: you can set it so the pull is square to the surface, or follows the anchor's own line if the anchor went in at an angle. Adjustable legs make that possible on uneven work.
  3. Rating: its maximum load is above the test load. A t60 load cell on a 25 kN bridge is still limited to 25 kN. For very high loads, a stiff fixed-leg beam pulling through a hollow ram flexes less than a bridge with adjustable legs.

Staht's bridge spreader plates fit the feet of the t25, t60, 375-25 and 575-25 bridges and spread the load on internal walls and roofs. The 3 leg adaptor turns a t25 or t60 bridge into a three-legged one for tight spaces. It replaces one pair of legs with a single Ø35 mm foot, centred where that pair stood (Staht datasheet, part 600-085), so no foot comes closer to the anchor than on the four-leg bridge: the 127 mm figure still applies.

More questions

Sources

  1. BS 8539:2012+A1:2021 Code of practice for the selection and installation of post-installed anchors in concrete and masonry, Annex B (equation B.12), BSI
  2. EOTA TR 053:2022-07 Recommendations for tests of metal injection anchors for use in masonry to be carried out on construction works, Section 3.2.1, EOTA
  3. Staht Bridge 375-25 product data, Staht
  4. Staht Bridge 375-60 product data, Staht
  5. Staht Bridge 575-25 product data, Staht

Wider bridges for deeper anchors

Staht's 375 mm and 575 mm bridges work with the t25 and t60 load cells.

Your basket

Loading your basket…